USPTO serial 76149873
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norman H Zlvin
NORMAN H ZLVIN COOPER & DUNHAM LLP1185 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | WOMEN'S MATERNITY CLOTHING, NAMELY WOVEN TOPS, DENIM PANTS, KNIT TOPS, PILL PANTS, SLEEP WEAR, PANT SETS, DRESSES, JUMPERS, KNIT PANTS AND SHORTS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 26, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |