USPTO serial 76149909
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
INDUO Gesellschaft zur Verwertung von Schutzrechten mbH & Co. KG
41 352 Korschenbroich, DE
Other trademarks owned by INDUO Gesellschaft zur Verwertung von Schutzrechten mbH & Co. KG
INDUO Gesellschaft zur Verwertung von Schutzrechten mbH & Co. KG
41 352 Korschenbroich, DE
Other trademarks owned by INDUO Gesellschaft zur Verwertung von Schutzrechten mbH & Co. KG
INDUO Gesellschaft zur Verwertung von Schutzrechten mbH & Co. KG
41 352 Korschenbroich, DE
Other trademarks owned by INDUO Gesellschaft zur Verwertung von Schutzrechten mbH & Co. KG
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Glenn E. Klepac
GLENN E KLEPAC825 FIFTH AVE STE 209NEW KENSINGTON, PA 15068-6310UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Wood beam integration systems for wood beams which are composed primarily of metal connection modules in the nature of brackets and have releasable connections to provide for angled placements in three dimensions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 3, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 10, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |