USPTO serial 76149923
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Oxford OX2 7BZ, GB
OXFORD, OX14 4SH, GB
OXFORD, OX14 4SH, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John P Rynkiewicz
JOHN P RYNKIEWICZ KAYE SCHOLER LLP901 FIFTEENTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals for use in the ceramics, coating, spraying and tool making industries; chemicals for use in ceramic moulding; chemicals for use in metallurgy; chemicals-namely, additives, fluxes, salts, release compounds, refractory powders and solutions all for use for alloying purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | Metal spray booths for painting, automotive-related uses, and in the use of prototype and production tooling and manufacturing processes; wire and rods of metal or metal alloys; wire for spray guns; articles of metal or metal alloys used in manufacturing and tooling processes; non-precious metals and metal alloys used in tooling | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Machines for use in tool making, applying coatings and making of shapes; machines for making coatings and shapes by metal spraying; machines for making shapes by freeze-casting; machines which employ robots in manufacturing and tooling processes; machine tools used in tooling processes; moulds; dies for use with machine tools; spray guns for applying paints, coatings and for use in tooling and manufacturing processes; robot machines for use in tooling and manufacturing processes; machine apparatus for handling powders in tooling and manufacturing processes; soldering and boring machines, and parts and fittings for all of the aforesaid goods sold as part of the goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Computer software for use in prototype and production tooling and manufacturing processes; electrical apparatus for use in metallurgy, namely, switches, receivers, transmitters; thermal imaging apparatus and microscopes used to examine and in the inspection in metallurgy, production tooling and in manufacturing processes; control apparatus for robots used in prototype and production tooling and manufacturing processes, namely switches, receivers and transmitters and parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods sold as part of the goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Training, seminars, conferences and educational services in metallurgy; training in the manufacture of metal articles; training in arc spraying | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |