Drawing for NOVARC

USPTO serial 76149923

NOVARC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ESTRADA, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOVARC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John P Rynkiewicz

JOHN P RYNKIEWICZ KAYE SCHOLER LLP901 FIFTEENTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for use in the ceramics, coating, spraying and tool making industries; chemicals for use in ceramic moulding; chemicals for use in metallurgy; chemicals-namely, additives, fluxes, salts, release compounds, refractory powders and solutions all for use for alloying purposesACTIVE
006Metal spray booths for painting, automotive-related uses, and in the use of prototype and production tooling and manufacturing processes; wire and rods of metal or metal alloys; wire for spray guns; articles of metal or metal alloys used in manufacturing and tooling processes; non-precious metals and metal alloys used in toolingACTIVE
007Machines for use in tool making, applying coatings and making of shapes; machines for making coatings and shapes by metal spraying; machines for making shapes by freeze-casting; machines which employ robots in manufacturing and tooling processes; machine tools used in tooling processes; moulds; dies for use with machine tools; spray guns for applying paints, coatings and for use in tooling and manufacturing processes; robot machines for use in tooling and manufacturing processes; machine apparatus for handling powders in tooling and manufacturing processes; soldering and boring machines, and parts and fittings for all of the aforesaid goods sold as part of the goodsACTIVE
009Computer software for use in prototype and production tooling and manufacturing processes; electrical apparatus for use in metallurgy, namely, switches, receivers, transmitters; thermal imaging apparatus and microscopes used to examine and in the inspection in metallurgy, production tooling and in manufacturing processes; control apparatus for robots used in prototype and production tooling and manufacturing processes, namely switches, receivers and transmitters and parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods sold as part of the goodsACTIVE
041Training, seminars, conferences and educational services in metallurgy; training in the manufacture of metal articles; training in arc sprayingACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 17, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 12, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 12, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 19, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 14, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 30, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 9, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 2, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 18, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Nov 28, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 17, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 5, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 3, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Dec 13, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 1, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance