USPTO serial 76149957
STONESKIRT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STONESKIRT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Malcolm L Moore
MALCOLM L MOORE MOORE & HANSEN90 S 7TH ST STE 2900MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4100UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | molded, non-metal composite blocks for forming a decorative wall around the periphery of a mobile home | ACTIVE | Apr 28, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |