USPTO serial 76150109
FRONTERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FRONTERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Miriam Claire Beezy
MIRIAM CLAIRE BEEZY MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP11377 W OLYMPIC BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for content personalization and management, customer relationship management and the processing of electronic transactions on a hosted basis; and computer software design and development services for others | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |