USPTO serial 76150127
HMP RAWHIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 1, 2003
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HMP RAWHIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bedford Park, IL
Bedford Park, IL
THE HARTZ MOUNTAIN CORPORATION
SECAUCUS, NJ
SAN DIEGO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy B. Goldsmith
AMY B GOLDSMITH GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVE 8TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Rawhide dog chews, snacks, or treats for use as a dental product for dogs by the veterinarian trade | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 5, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Harper Leather Goods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Harper Leather Goods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by THE HARTZ MOUNTAIN CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by RAMNARAYAN, KAL
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named HMP RAWHIDE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 17, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |