USPTO serial 76150138
CASUAL GARDEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CASUAL GARDEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD J. DEMARCO
EDWARD J DEMARCO BALLARD, SPAHR, ANDREWS & INGERSOLL1735 MARKET ST 51ST FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7599UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | coasters made of metal, decorative plates made of metal, bird houses, bird feeders, bird baths not being structures, candle holders not of precious metal, planters, lawn sprinklers, urns, decorative boxes not made of metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BEL DESIGN STUDIOS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Hen-Feathers Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Hen-Feathers Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named CASUAL GARDEN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 3, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |