USPTO serial 76150216
OPTIPOINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPTIPOINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical, electrotechnical and electronic apparatus and devices, and electrical devices for recording, emission, transmission, switching, reception and reproduction and processing of sounds, signals, characters and/or images, namely, communication platforms, communication servers, routers, switches and gateways; communications devices, namely, routers, switches, and gateways for the integration of voice, image, text, data, multimedia, and full-motion video communications in telecommunications networks; communications computers; computer software for management and integration of telecommunications networks, computer software for use in the operation and maintenance of telecommunications equipment, computer telephony software, computer software for the integration of voice and data; optical, electrotechnical and electronic equipment for voice, image, text, data, multimedia and full-motion video communications technology, especially for voice data communication, namely, communication platforms, communication servers, routers, switches and gateways; telephone dialing devices; telephones, video phones, voice boxes; domestic telephone systems comprised of handsets and console unites, electronic and voice message recorders and speaker phones; caller ID servers; private automatic branch exchanges, photocopiers, telecommunications networks consisting of exchange and transmission equipment, individual modules and components of such equipment, namely, power supply units, transmission media, namely, telecommunications cables and optical fibers and pertinent connection elements, wireless transmission media used for infrared and radio communications; parts of all the aforementioned apparatus and devices; communications installations composed of a combination of the aforementioned appliances and devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Operation and administration of telecommunications systems and telecommunications networks for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Rental of telecommunications equipment and networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |