USPTO serial 76150243
BINGOOO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BINGOOO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALISON J CHOPPELAS
ALISON J CHOPPELAS OPPENHEIMER WOLFF & DONNELLY LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 10356PALO ALTO, CA 94303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING OF EDUCATIONAL CONGRESSES AND SEMINARS FOR TEACHING THE USE AND OPERATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ON-LINE COMPUTER GAMES; EDUCATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING CORRESPONDENCE COURSES AND CONDUCTING CLASSES, SEMINARS, CONFERENCES, WORKSHOPS, IN THE FIELD OF THE USE AND OPERATION OF SOFTWARE, UPDATING AND RENTAL OF TELEVISION APPARATUS AND RADIOS; PRODUCTION OF VIDEOTAPES AND MOTION PICTURE FILMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |