Drawing for SYSTEMONIC

USPTO serial 76150264

SYSTEMONIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYSTEMONIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert M Wasnofski Jr

ROBERT M WASNOFSKI JR BAKER BOTTS LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Integrated circuits; data processors; computer peripherals; printed circuit boards and electric circuit boards; computer interface boards; computer software used for designing semiconductor devices; computer software used for developing computer programs; computer software development tools; computer software used for developing computer programs, computer software used as a device driver, computer software used as application specific firmware, all for use in designing, producing and testing integrated circuitsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 15, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 25, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 23, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 11, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance