USPTO serial 76150393
STELLACAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STELLACAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
B-1000 Brussels, BE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing on-line retailing, wholesale and computerized ordering services for others via a global computer network in the fields of beer, beer products and bar services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Transmission of messages and images via computer and via satellite; providing interactive web sites via a global computer network, namely, real time on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning beer, beer products and bar services; electronic mail services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Restaurant, hotel, cafe, pub, bar and cafeteria services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |