Drawing for CHROME ANYWHERE

USPTO serial 76150445

CHROME ANYWHERE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHROME ANYWHERE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEPHANIE M BURNS

STEPHANIE M BURNS CHROME DATA CORPORATION700 NE MULTNOMAH ST STE 1500PORTLAND, OR 97232-4115UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042(Based on Use in Commerce) Wireless application service provider services, namely, hosting computer software applications of others in the nature of translating, hosting, serving and delivering content, data and information that enables users to configure and price automobiles via wireless communication devices (Based on Intent to Use) wireless application service provider services, namely, hosting computer software applications of others in the nature of matching vehicle identification numbers to vehicles in automobile dealer inventory to enable users to configure, price and match automobiles in dealer inventory via wireless communication devicesACTIVESep 28, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 26, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 3, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 24, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 31, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 3, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Apr 18, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 11, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Jan 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 29, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance