Drawing for EVP

USPTO serial 76150979

EVP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SCOTT J SLAVICK

SCOTT W SMILIE PATZIK, FRANK & SAMOTNY LTDSTE 900150 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035computer services, namely, providing an affinity site wherein users may purchase various goods on a global computer network; advertising and marketing services provided to online businesses, namely promoting the goods and services of others through creating and placing electronic advertisements and direct marketing communications on an electronic website accessed through a global computer network; consultation services in the area of preparing and conducting marketing programs; computerized database management; providing business consultation in the field of electronic commerce and; providing consulting in the field of business techniques relating to electronic commerce; providing technical assistance in organizing and administering online retail shopping sites in the websites of others on global computer networksACTIVE
042computer applications services for third parties conducting online businesses, namely, providing application hosting, application management and application rental servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 7, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 24, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Mar 24, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Oct 27, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Sep 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 22, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 13, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 10, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 24, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 19, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 20, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Mar 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance