USPTO serial 76150979
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
West Chester, PA
NORTHBROOK, IL
CHICAGO, IL
CHICAGO, IL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT J SLAVICK
SCOTT W SMILIE PATZIK, FRANK & SAMOTNY LTDSTE 900150 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | computer services, namely, providing an affinity site wherein users may purchase various goods on a global computer network; advertising and marketing services provided to online businesses, namely promoting the goods and services of others through creating and placing electronic advertisements and direct marketing communications on an electronic website accessed through a global computer network; consultation services in the area of preparing and conducting marketing programs; computerized database management; providing business consultation in the field of electronic commerce and; providing consulting in the field of business techniques relating to electronic commerce; providing technical assistance in organizing and administering online retail shopping sites in the websites of others on global computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer applications services for third parties conducting online businesses, namely, providing application hosting, application management and application rental services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |