USPTO serial 76151228
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David P Petersen
DAVID P PETERSEN KLARQUIST SPARKMAN CAMPBELL LEIGH & WHINONE WORLD TRADE CTR STE 1600121 SW SALMON STPORTLAND, OR 97204| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing on-line business information, namely, compiling electronically collected information about businesses and their products and services and providing such information electronically to clients for potential future use in business-to-business marketplace; providing requests for quotes and business leads to third party businesses; providing links to access sites of others located on an electronic communications computer network which feature information, products and services of interest to businesses; providing an on-line business community calendar of events of others; providing business to business file sharing and e-mail over an electronic communications computer network; providing articles and information of interest to businesses over an electronic communications computer network; and providing responses to questions from businesses over an electronic communications computer network | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |