USPTO serial 76151605
CALI 10
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CALI 10?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mandaluyonq City, 1550 Metro Manila, PH
Mandaluyonq City, 1550 Metro Manila, PH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELLIOTT C. BANKENDORF
Elliott C. Bankendorf Partridge IP Law P.C.Suite 720321 N. Clark StreetCHICAGO, IL 60654Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Shandy, beer, ale, porter, mineral water, aerated water, soft drinks, concentrates and syrups for making soft drinks | ABANDONED | Dec 22, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 10, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 10, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |