USPTO serial 76151683
LIFECOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, MICHELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIFECOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID R ELLIS
3233 E BAY DR STE 101LARGO, FL 33771UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Security, fire and burglar alarm systems used in assisted living facilities, apartments, and condominiums, comprised of fire alarms, personal security alarms, and burglar alarms, smoke detectors, emergency pullcords and pendants, dome lights, auxiliary alarm horns, digital displays, printers, magnetic door locks, building access controls and switches, wireless call buttons, portable radios, pagers, batteries, and surge protectors | ABANDONED | Sep 17, 1998 |
| 035 | Wholesale distributorships and retail store services featuring security, fire and burglar alarm systems | ABANDONED | Sep 17, 1998 |
| 037 | Installation, repair and maintenance of security, fire and burglar alarm systems | ABANDONED | Sep 17, 1998 |
| 042 | Monitoring and verification of security, fire and burglar alarm systems | ABANDONED | Sep 17, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Diversified Technology Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Diversified Technology Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LIFECOM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 31, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 31, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |