USPTO serial 76151909
CELSTREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2957413Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 31, 2005
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CELSTREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Celstream Technologies Private Limited
Bangalore, IN
Other trademarks owned by Celstream Technologies Private Limited
Celstream Technologies Private Limited
Bangalore, IN
Other trademarks owned by Celstream Technologies Private Limited
Celstream Technologies Private Limited
Bangalore 560 029, IN
Other trademarks owned by Celstream Technologies Private Limited
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. APOLZON
LAWRENCE E. APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.866 UNITED NATIONS PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | ENGINEERING SERVICES, NAMELY COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY CUSTOMER-NEED ANALYSIS; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY TROUBLESHOOTING, OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROBLEMS, INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES, NAMELY ENHANCEMENT, PROTOTYPING AND MAINTENANCE FOR OTHERS | EXPIRED | Jul 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Celstream Technologies Private Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Celstream Technologies Private Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Celstream Technologies Private Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CELSTREAM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 20, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 30, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2003 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2001 | 44DA | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |