USPTO serial 76152006
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Sakai, Osaka, 590-8577, JP
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard C. Gilmore
Richard C. Gilmore MASCHOFF BRENNAN LAYCOCK GILMORE ISRAELSEN & WRIGH111 S. Main StreetSuite 600Salt Lake City, UT 84111| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | BICYCLES, PARTS AND FITTINGS FOR BICYCLES, NAMELY, HUBS, INTERNAL GEAR HUBS, HUB QUICK RELEASE LEVERS, GEAR RELEASE LEVERS, GEAR SHIFT LEVERS, FRONT DERAILLEURS, REAR DERAILLEURS, CHAIN GUIDES, FREEWHEELS, SPROCKETS, PULLEYS, CHAINS, CHAIN DEFLECTORS, SHIFT CABLES, CRANKS, CRANK SETS, CHAIN WHEELS, PEDALS, TOE CLIPS, BRAKE LEVERS, FRONT BRAKES, REAR BRAKES, BRAKE CABLES, BRAKE SHOES, RIMS, WHEELS, SPOKES, SPOKE CLIPS, BOTTOM BRACKETS, SEAT PILLARS, SEAT PILLAR QUICK RELEASE, HEAD PARTS FOR FRAME-FORK ASSEMBLY, FRAMES, SUSPENSIONS, HANDLEBARS, HANDLE STEMS, GRIPS FOR HANDLEBARS, SADDLES, MUD GUARDS, KICK STANDS, CARRIERS, BELLS, HORNS AND REARVIEW MIRRORS FOR BICYCLES, DERAILLEURS CONTROLLED BY COMPUTER | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |