USPTO serial 76152096
CATWALKCAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 19, 2003
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CATWALKCAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Austin, TX
Austin, TX
80538 MUNCHEN, DE
80538 MUNCHEN, DE
80538 MUNCHEN, DE
80538 Munchen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Purvi J Patel
Purvi J Patel Haynes and Boone, LLP2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700Dallas, TX 75219-7673UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sage, Martin
- Other trademarks owned by Sage, Gigi Tomasek
- Other trademarks owned by SAGE INNOVATIONS GRBH
- Other trademarks owned by SAGE INNOVATIONS GRBH
- Other trademarks owned by SAGE INNOVATIONS GRBH
- Other trademarks owned by Becker, Sonja
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CATWALKCAFE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |