USPTO serial 76152146
SAGE UNIVERSITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAGE UNIVERSITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Austin, TX
Austin, TX
80538 MUNCHEN, DE
80538 MUNCHEN, DE
80538 Mfinchen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PURVI J PATEL
PURVI J PATEL HAYNES & BOONE LLPBANK OF AMERICA PLZ STE 3100 901 MAIN STDALLAS, TX 75202-3789UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | advertising agencies; business consulting services, namely, providing support of third parties in founding business start ups; and business management and planning | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing courses of instruction at the primary, secondary and college level, as well as distributing course material in connection therewith; educational services, namely, conducting seminars and workshops in the fields of personal training, business, psychological training, personal development, improvement in efficiency; distributing course material in connection therewith; conducting entertainment exhibitions in the nature of shows, festivals, magic shows, entertainment shows; organizing exhibitions for educational, cultural, sporting and entertainment purposes; publication of books, booklets, magazines; audio recording and production | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sage, Martin
- Other trademarks owned by Sage, Gigi Tomasek
- Other trademarks owned by SAGE INNOVATIONS GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by SAGE INNOVATIONS GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by Becker, Sonja
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SAGE UNIVERSITY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |