USPTO serial 76152258
SAGE UNIVERSITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAGE UNIVERSITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Austin, TX
Austin, TX
80538 MUNCHEN, DE
80538 MUNCHEN, DE
80538 Munchen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PURVI J PATEL
PURVI J PATEL HAYNES AND BOONE LLPBANK OF AMERICA PLZ STE 3100 901 MAIN STDALLAS, TX 75202-3789UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | pre-recorded sound carriers and data carriers namely videotapes, CD-ROMS, audio discs, video discs, computer discs, audio cassettes, video cassettes all featuring instructions, recordal of scenes, and music, for use in connection with self-improvement, personal growth and development, and leadership training seminars | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sage, Martin
- Other trademarks owned by Sage, Gigi Tomasek
- Other trademarks owned by SAGE INNOVATIONS GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by SAGE INNOVATIONS GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by Becker, Sonja
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SAGE UNIVERSITY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |