USPTO serial 76152368
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Toronto M5H 4C7, Ontario, CA
WESTFORD, MA
WESTFORD, MA
GANNETT SATELLITE INFORMATION NETWORK, INC.
MCLEAN, VA
Other trademarks owned by GANNETT SATELLITE INFORMATION NETWORK, INC.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathleen E. Fuller, Bruce S. Antley, James M. Burger, Peter C. Cassat, Adam C. Chase, Kelly A. Donohue, Todd D. Gray, Jonathan D. Hart, Mira J. Koplovsky, Margaret L. Miller, Barry S. Persh, Elisa P. Rosen, Marc S. Sher, Briana E. Thibeau, Kristi L. Thomp
KATHLEEN E FULLER DOW, LOHNES & ALBERTSON PLLC1200 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NW STE 8WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Rental of advertising space; creating and dissemination advertising matter for others through audio-visual displays; and preparing audio-visual displays in the field of news, traffic reports, business news, entertainment news and information, weather reports and tenant information on behalf of others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |