USPTO serial 76152420
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A Wright
KEITH W MEDANSKY, CHRISTINA L MARTINI DLA PIPER US LLPPO BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and computer software for use in the transportation industry, namely computer hardware and computer software for use in analyzing and diagnosing truck and automotive engines, transmissions, braking systems, instrument clusters, and electrical and mechanical systems | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Providing technical support, analysis and diagnosis services for truck and automotive engines, transmissions, braking systems, instrument clusters, and electrical and mechanical systems via terrestrial wireless technology and global satellite technology | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 31, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |