Drawing for NEXIQ

USPTO serial 76152420

NEXIQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NEXIQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark A Wright

KEITH W MEDANSKY, CHRISTINA L MARTINI DLA PIPER US LLPPO BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and computer software for use in the transportation industry, namely computer hardware and computer software for use in analyzing and diagnosing truck and automotive engines, transmissions, braking systems, instrument clusters, and electrical and mechanical systemsABANDONED
042Providing technical support, analysis and diagnosis services for truck and automotive engines, transmissions, braking systems, instrument clusters, and electrical and mechanical systems via terrestrial wireless technology and global satellite technologyABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Nov 1, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Nov 1, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Sep 26, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 7, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jul 11, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jun 4, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 31, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 15, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 1, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance