USPTO serial 76152576
DESIGNLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2992747Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 6, 2005
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DESIGNLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Louis, MO, US
SAINT LOUIS, MO, US
St. Louis, MO, US
St. Louis, MO, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laila S. Wolfgram
Laila S. Wolfgram Stinson Leonard Street LLP7700 Forsyth BlvdSuite 1100ST. LOUIS, MO 63105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | furniture, namely cabinets constructed from materials which are resistant to corrosion by moisture and humidity for use in wet laboratories, hospitals, water treatment facilities, vivariums, necropsy centers, and other environments where resistance to corrosion by moisture and humidity is required | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 27, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Young Group, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by SPECRITE DESIGNS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by The Young Group, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by The Young Group, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named DESIGNLINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 9, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 7, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 25, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |