USPTO serial 76152731
PRINCESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRINCESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TEDD S LEVINE
TEDD S LEVINE LAW OFFICES OF LEVINE & BALDINGER LLC1010 FRANKLIN AVE2ND FLGARDEN CITY, NY 11530Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | CARDBOARD GIFT BOXES, CORKBOARD, PHOTO ALBUMS, AND CARDBOARD TRAIN CASES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |