USPTO serial 76152866
IFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David N Schachter
DAVID N SCHACHTER SHERMAN & HOWARD LLC633 17TH ST STE 3000DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | small business retirement planning services and employee benefit services, namely, providing and administering 401k plans, SEPs, individual retirement accounts and analogous retirement savings plans | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |