USPTO serial 76152925
B.I S.P .
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with B.I S.P .?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul E Fahrenkopf
PAUL E FAHRENKOPF BARNES & THORNBURGFRANKLIN TWR BLDG1401 EYE ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Consultation in the organization and management of businesses; personnel management consultation; investigation and information in business matters; preparation of business reports; market research; recruitment of personnel; distribution of advertising material; performance of services in the commercial area, namely managerial consultation in the area of strategic and operational management planning, managerial consultation in the area of the conception and introduction of accounting systems and electronic data processing; accounting activities for third parties | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | industrial administrative consultation for businesses in the areas of raising equity capital, market introduction, management buy-out or management buy-in; financial and economic consultation in the acquisition and sale of businesses as well as financing of the same; preparation of monthly, quarterly, and annual financial statements for others; mediation of strategic partnerships; computer consultation in the areas of in the areas of selection, introduction, development, and adaptation of standard commercial software and computer aided document management systems; rendering or performance of services of an application service provider in the area of standard commercial software systems; computer software programming and software updating services for others, namely, providing adaptive and/or supplemental programming on the basis of standard commercial software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |