USPTO serial 76152928
FLUID TECHNOLOGIES FOR A BETTER WORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2946336Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 3, 2005
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLUID TECHNOLOGIES FOR A BETTER WORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Teresan Gilbert
TERESAN GILBERT THE LUBRIZOL CORPORATION29400 LAKELAND BLVDWICKLIFFE, OH 44092-2298UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemical additives for fuel treatment and motor oils; tempering chemicals for use in metalworking; chemicals for use in the manufacture of lubricants, water-soluble industrial chemicals, industrial oils, drilling fluids, coatings, inks, explosives, gears and automotive fluids; chemicals used in oil drilling; hydraulic fluids for general use; brake fluid; power steering fluid | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 7, 2001 |
| 004 | All purpose automotive and industrial lubricants; transmission fluid; all purpose penetrating oil; industrial oils; motor oil; fuel oil; diesel fuel; gasoline | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 26, 2002 |
| 007 | Mechanical mixing machines; internal combustion engines for machines operation, and parts therefor; air filters for mechanical purposes; fuel filters; catalytic converters for motors and engines; fuel, oil and water pumps for motor and engines; machines for injecting and blending additives in fluid streams, and parts therefor | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 31, 2002 |
| 009 | Electronic controls for treating engine exhaust; fuel, oil and water meters; sensors to measure chemical properties, flow and temperature of fuels, lubricants, oil and water; computer hardware and operating programs for monitoring and operating internal combustion engine | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 31, 2002 |
| 035 | Providing business and consumer information on fluid technologies in the areas of high performance chemicals, systems and services for industry and transportation via an interactive website on a global network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 2000 |
| 042 | Providing technical information on fluid technologies in the areas of high performance chemicals, systems and services for industry and transportation via an interactive website on a global network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 11, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lubrizol Corporation, The
- Other trademarks owned by Lubrizol Corporation, The
- Other trademarks owned by Lubrizol Corporation, The
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FLUID TECHNOLOGIES FOR A BETTER WORLD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 3, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 10, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |