USPTO serial 76153019
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Kanebo Kabushiki Kaisha (Kanebo, Ltd.)
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Kanebo Kabushiki Kaisha (Kanebo, Ltd.)
Kanebo Kabushiki Kaisha (Kanebo, Ltd.)
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Kanebo Kabushiki Kaisha (Kanebo, Ltd.)
KABUSHIKI KAISHA KANEBO KESHOHIN (KANEBO COSMETICS INC.)
TOKYO, JP
Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA KANEBO KESHOHIN (KANEBO COSMETICS INC.)
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael R Davis
MICHAEL R DAVIS WENDEROTH LIND & PONACK LLP2033 K ST NWSTE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, face cream, skin cream, face packs, skin lotion, milky face lotion, lip cream, make-up base, skin cleansing preparations, soaps, skin whitening creams, foundation make-up, face powder, bath powder, eye make-up, eye liner, mascara, eye brow pencils, lipsticks, cheek color, nail care preparations, namely, nail color and cuticle coat, cosmetic preparations for bath, namely, non-medicated bath salts, bubble bath and bath oils; hair care preparations, namely, shampoo, rinse, conditioner, lotions, hair creams, hair-dye, spray, gel and mousse; and perfumery, namely, perfume, cologne, eau de toilette | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |