USPTO serial 76153443
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
UNTERFOHRING, DE
D-42103 Wuppertal, DE
D-42103 Wuppertal, DE
D-42103 Wuppertal, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William P. Berridge
William P. Berridge Oliff & Berridge, PLCP.O. Box 320850Alexandria, VA 22320-4850UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | WATERPROOF, WATER VAPOR PERMEABLE MEMBRANES MADE OF POLYMERS AS SEMI-FINISHED PRODUCTS FOR TEXTILE AND TECHNICAL COMPOSITES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | WOVEN AND KNITTED FABRICS, NON-WOVEN FABRICS, TEXTILES, TEXTILE COMPOSITES, ALL FOR MAKING CLOTHING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 27, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 30, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |