USPTO serial 76153520
LURMARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2814448Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 17, 2004
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LURMARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mejeriforeningen Danish Dairy Board
DK-8000 Arhus C, DK
Other trademarks owned by Mejeriforeningen Danish Dairy Board
Mejeriforeningen Danish Dairy Board
DK-8000 Arhus C, DK
Other trademarks owned by Mejeriforeningen Danish Dairy Board
Mejeriforeningen Danish Dairy Board
DK-8200 Aarhus N, DK
Other trademarks owned by Mejeriforeningen Danish Dairy Board
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E Abelman
Lawrence E Abelman ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUE10th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10017-5621Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Butter and spreadable dairy products similar to butter | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mejeriforeningen Danish Dairy Board
- Other trademarks owned by Mejeriforeningen Danish Dairy Board
- Other trademarks owned by Mejeriforeningen Danish Dairy Board
- Other trademarks in Class A
- Similar marks named LURMARK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2019 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 24, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 24, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2003 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |