Drawing for INTERCONNECT

USPTO serial 76153528

INTERCONNECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ERVIN, INGA
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERCONNECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dale Lischer

DALE LISCHER PROMENADE IISMITH GAMBRELL & RUSSELL1230 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 3100ATLANTA, GA 30309-3592

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, computer software for telecommunications accounting purposes; computer software for inter-network accounting in the telecommunications fieldACTIVE
041Computer education training services and computer education informational servicesACTIVE
042Computer software design for others; computer software design, namely, upgrade and development of computer software for others; computer programming for others; installation of computer software; maintenance of computer software; computer consultation; computer consultation, namely, advisory, information and support services for computer software designACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Jul 9, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jul 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 9, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 9, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Mar 27, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 15, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Feb 25, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 30, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance