Drawing for AIR CASE

USPTO serial 76153530

AIR CASE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FRONT, MITCHELL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIR CASE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Todd S Sharinn

TODD S SHARINN GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP885 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009BAGS AND SHIPPING CASES, NAMELY, CAMERA BAGS AND BAGS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION AND STORAGE OF CAMERA ACCESSORIES, COMPUTER CASES AND CASES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF COMPUTER ACCESSORIES AND OTHER ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTSACTIVEMar 1, 1988
018LUGGAGE, NAMELY, TRAVELING BAGS, BACKPACKS, BRIEFCASES AND ATTACHE CASESACTIVEMar 1, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 12, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 12, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 10, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Oct 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 13, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 6, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Feb 5, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 24, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Oct 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance