USPTO serial 76153587
ENZA-CLEAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DONNELL, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENZA-CLEAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John F Learman
JOHN F LEARMAN REISING ETHINGTON BARNES KISSELLE, ETAL5291 COLONY DR NSAGINAW, MI 48603-7157UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | All-purpose enzyme-based cleaning, degreasing, deodorizing, and waste breakdown preparations useful for cleaning waste water, petroleum sludge and chemical scum; cleaning, degreasing and deodorizing preparations useful for cleaning industrial equipment, walls, floors, work surfaces, drain systems, and portable toilets | ABANDONED | Mar 23, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |