USPTO serial 76153677
INTREPID WWW.INTREPIDGAMES.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTREPID WWW.INTREPIDGAMES.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
INTREPID COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT LIMITED
GUILDFORD, SURREY GU2 5YD, GB
Other trademarks owned by INTREPID COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT LIMITED
INTREPID COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT LIMITED
GUILDFORD, SURREY GU2 5YD, GB
Other trademarks owned by INTREPID COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marsha G. Gentner
MARSHA G GENTNER JACOBSON PRICE HOLMAN & STERN PLLCTHE JENIFER BLDG400 SEVENTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game cartridges; computer game cassettes; computer game programs; game tapes; and computer game compact discs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTREPID COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by INTREPID COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named INTREPID WWW.INTREPIDGAMES.COM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |