USPTO serial 76154116
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Manufacturing of artificial resins | ACTIVE | May 5, 1995 |
| 004 | Manufacturing of Candles | ACTIVE | May 5, 1995 |
| 016 | Manufacturing of Note Cards and Stationery | ACTIVE | May 5, 1995 |
| 030 | Manufacturing of Dry layered Beans, Dry layered Beans, Dry layered Cookie Mixes, Dips, Jams, Tea's, Candy | ACTIVE | May 5, 1995 |
| 042 | Hygienic and Beauty Care | ACTIVE | May 5, 1995 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |