USPTO serial 76154423
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Soy and soy-based finished goods sold to retailers, distributors and food service operations, namely, tofu, fried soybean, soy-based food beverage used as a milk substitute, soy pudding, margarine, milk, cream, yogurt, cheese, cottage cheese, butter | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 19, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2015 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 6, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |