Drawing for GOBOATING.NET

USPTO serial 76154581

GOBOATING.NET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOBOATING.NET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H David Starr

H DAVID STARR SLAVIT & GILL PC1025 THOMAS JEFFERSON ST NWSTE 425 WWASHINGTON, DC 20007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing retail information via the global communications network, namely providing information concerning retail or new and used boats, marine equipment and marine and boating suppliesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Dec 11, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Dec 11, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 11, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 26, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Mar 10, 2003RECGACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED
Dec 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 27, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 14, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 7, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Nov 5, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jun 26, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance