USPTO serial 76154873
DELFINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3733031Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 5, 2010
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DELFINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Incide Corporate Consultants Ltd.
London W1V 9LD, GB
Incide Corporate Consultants Ltd.
London W1V 9LD, GB
Incide Corporate Consultants Ltd.
London W1V 9LD, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas W. Brooke
THOMAS W. BROOKE HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLPSUITE 1100800 17TH STREET NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-6801Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Motor land vehicles, namely, sports cars | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Incide Corporate Consultants Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Incide Corporate Consultants Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Incide Corporate Consultants Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named DELFINO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2009 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2009 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 26, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 8, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 4, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 11, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 26, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 26, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |