Drawing for PENNY JUNCTION

USPTO serial 76154885

PENNY JUNCTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
COREA, ANDY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PENNY JUNCTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kirstin M Jahn

KIRSTIN M JAHN THE LAW OFFICE OF KIRSTIN M JAHN565 CALIFORNIA AVERENO, NV 89509UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009use with gaming equipment, namely, slot machines with or without a video output, electromechanical gaming equipment and electronic gaming equipmentACTIVEJan 28, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 27, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 5, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 5, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Oct 11, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
May 30, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Apr 26, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Apr 26, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Oct 3, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance