USPTO serial 76154947
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Las Vegas, NV
LAS VEGAS, NV
CD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC
PARSIPPANY, NJ
Other trademarks owned by CD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC
CD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC
PARSIPPANY, NJ
Other trademarks owned by CD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey C Katz
JEFFREY C KATZ DAVIS & GILBERT LLP1740 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2007 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |