USPTO serial 76154976
SPUTNIK TECHNOLOGY VENTURES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPUTNIK TECHNOLOGY VENTURES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES H WALTERS
JAMES H WALTERS PATENTTM.USPO BOX 82788PORTLAND, OR 97282-0788UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS INVESTIGATIONS; EFFICIENCY EXPERTS; COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONSULTATION; EVALUATION OF STANDING TIMBER; ECONOMIC FORECASTING; PROVIDING BUSINESS INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF EXCHANGE BUSINESS; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONSULTATION; DATA PROCESSING FOR OTHERS; BUSINESS INFORMATION SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | STOCK EXCHANGE PRICE QUOTATIONS; BUSINESS BROKERAGE; CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF ISSUING TOKENS OF VALUE; ISSUE OF TOKENS OF VALUE; CAPITAL INVESTMENT CONSULTATIONS; PROVIDING FINANCIAL INFORMATION; FINANCIAL CLEARING HOUSES; FINANCIAL CONSULTANCY; INSURANCE CONSULTANCY; REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL; FACTORING AGENCIES; FINANCING SERVICES; BANKING; FINANCIAL ANALYSES; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; MUTUAL FUND INVESTMENT; SAFETY DEPOSIT BOX SERVICES; SECURITIES BROKERAGE; FISCAL ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE FEATURING FINANCIAL INFORMATION, NAMELY FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS, CHECK LISTS AND RESEARCH REPORTS; BROKERAGE AND CONSULTATION WITH REGARD TO FINANCING, FUNDS SHARES, CAPITAL ASSETS, LEASING OF COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE, CAPITAL SHARES, AND OTHER STOCK EXCHANGE BUSINESS; SECURITIES EXCHANGE SERVICES; SECURITIES INFORMATION SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | DELIVERING OF MESSAGES BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND IMAGES VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | WOOD WORKING BY THE CYLINDERING MACHINE | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ON-LINE BOOKS IN THE FIELD OF FINANCIAL ACTIVITY; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CONSULTANCY; MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CONDUCTING RESEARCH AND STUDIES RELATING TO TECHNICAL COMPUTER PROJECTS; PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF HIGH TECHNOLOGIES; DESIGN AND PLANNING OF SAWMILLS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SPUTNIK GROUP LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SPUTNIK TECHNOLOGY VENTURES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |