USPTO serial 76155062
TOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-80539 Munich, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald L Dennison
DONALD L DENNISON DENNISON SCHULTZ DOUGHERTY & MACDONALD1727 KING ST STE 105ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2700UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Cell lines for use in the production of recombinant proteins for medical research, laboratory and scientific uses | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations, namely cell lines for use in the production of recombinant proteins for medical use, cells which are suitable for the manufacture of biological pharmaceutical products, cell-based preparations for use in gene therapy, namely vectors for gene transfer; nucleic acids and plasmids; all purpose disinfectants; vermicides, fungicides and herbicides, all for agricultural use | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Agricultural, horticultural and forestry products namely, plant seeds, foodstuffs for animals; genetically altered plants; seeds and plants utilizing DNA manipulation | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Agricultural research and development in the fields of genetically engineered plants, seeds, and crops, transgene breeding management based upon recombination locus; gene transfer into nuclear and plastid gnomes, biotechnology, namely genetic engineering and recombinant DNA technology; scientific agricultural research services in the field of planning and realization of the preparation of vectors, especially for gene transfer; consultation and research services in the field of planning and realization of the preparation of plasmids, and nucleic acids, and transgene introduction, integration and movement into crops and varieties for others; plant hybridization; and computer programming for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |