USPTO serial 76155076
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Warren A Sklar
WARREN A SKLAR RENNER OTTO BOISSELLE & SKLAR LLP1621 EUCLID AVE NINETEENTH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44115-2191UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs or software to enable the assembly, bundling or grouping of information, and the sharing and retrieval of information between or among entities, via a computer network or telecommunications device; computer software to allow users and/or businesses to obtain and to share, via a computer network or telecommunications device, context related information arranged in a bundle, group or structure concerning business information, information concerning products and services, information concerning employment and job availability, and information relating to retail services for clothing, electrical appliances, toiletries, recorded music, books and food; computer software to provide a viewable display of context related information arranged in a bundle, group or structure concerning business information, information concerning products and services, information concerning employment and job availability, and information relating to retail services for clothing, electrical appliances, toiletries, recorded music, books and food | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |