USPTO serial 76155220
WRXOIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WRXOIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEE D STIMMEL
LEE D STIMMEL STIMMEL STIMMEL & SMITH PC155 MONTGOMERY ST FL 12SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-4105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ADDITIVES TO GASOLINE AND PETROL TO MOTOR FUEL, ANTI-RUST GREASE AND OIL BRAKE FLUIDS, DIESEL OIL, ENGINE OIL, ENGINE COOLANT FLUIDS FOR HYDRAULIC CIRCUITS, FUELSAVING PREPARATIONS, GASOLINE INCLUDING GASOLING ENGINE OILS FOR LUBRICATING OILS,MOTOR OIL (INCLUDING SYNTHETIC MOTOR OIL, OIL AND FLUID FOR POWER STEERING AND TRANSMISSION | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | FULLY SYNTHETIC, SEMI SYNTHETIC, SYNTHETIC BLEND AND MINERAL LUBRICANTS AND OILS FOR ALL PURPOSES AND AUTOMOTIVE USE (NON-CHEMICAL) MOTOR OIL ADDITIVES AND FULLY SYNTHETIC, SEMI-SYNTHETIC, SYNTHETIC BLEND AND MINERAL MOTOR OIL | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |