Drawing for BINGO 9 LINE

USPTO serial 76155363

BINGO 9 LINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BINGO 9 LINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bernhard Kreten

BERNHARD KRETEN BERNHARD KRETEN ESQ & ASSOCIATES1331 GARDEN HWY STE 300SACRAMENTO, CA 95833UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009gaming devices, namely, gaming machines and computer game software thereforACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Mar 2, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 4, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
May 20, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 20, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
May 20, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 22, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Feb 20, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 15, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Dec 8, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
May 14, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 13, 2003ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 1, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 25, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance