Drawing for PHILIPPE GROUP

USPTO serial 76155380

PHILIPPE GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHILIPPE GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce S Londa

BRUCE S LONDA NORRIS, MCLAUGHLIN & MARCUS PA875 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035PROVIDING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, MANAGEMENT CONSULTATION AND BUSINESS INFORMATION, TO OTHERS, REGARDING BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION OF BUSINESSES, IN RELATION TO FINANCIAL MATTERS, COMMERCIAL AFFAIRS EVALUATIONACTIVE
036PROVIDING FINANCIAL PLANNING, FINANCIAL PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, CURRENCY EXCHANGE SERVICES, FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND CONSULTATION, SHARES INVESTMENT, FINANCIAL INVESTMENT IN THE FIELD OF SHAREHOLDING, REAL ESTATE, SECURITIES, CURRENCY EXCHANGE AND ADVICE; BROKERAGE SERVICE DEALING IN SHARES AND TRANSFERABLE SECURITIES, IN THE FIELD OF INSURANCE, STOCKS AND COMMODITIES; ELECTRONIC CASH TRANSACTIONS, PROVIDING FINANCIAL INFORMATION TO OTHERS, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT TO OTHERS; FINANCIAL EVALUATION OF BUSINESSES, REAL PROPERTY, PERSONAL PROPERTY, CREDIT BUREAU SERVICES, CREDIT UNION SERVICES, ESTATE TRUST MANAGEMENT, PROVIDING SAFETY DEPOSIT BOX SERVICESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 12, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 19, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 5, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 22, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 31, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 19, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 13, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Jul 13, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 6, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 22, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance