USPTO serial 76155589
PICTUREVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 15, 2004
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PICTUREVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
INTERACTIVE CLASSIFIEDS NETWORK CORPORATION
San Francisco, CA
Other trademarks owned by INTERACTIVE CLASSIFIEDS NETWORK CORPORATION
INTERACTIVE CLASSIFIEDS NETWORK CORPORATION
San Francisco, CA
Other trademarks owned by INTERACTIVE CLASSIFIEDS NETWORK CORPORATION
INTERACTIVE CLASSIFIEDS NETWORK CORPORATION
San Francisco, CA
Other trademarks owned by INTERACTIVE CLASSIFIEDS NETWORK CORPORATION
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID JUNG
DAVID JUNG JUNG & JUNGMILLS BLDG STE 900220 MONTGOMERY STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | computer on-line telecommunications gateway service, namely, a gateway link that allows the user to view pictures and movies via a global computer information network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERACTIVE CLASSIFIEDS NETWORK CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by INTERACTIVE CLASSIFIEDS NETWORK CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by INTERACTIVE CLASSIFIEDS NETWORK CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named PICTUREVIEW
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |