USPTO serial 76155864
LENSMAIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LENSMAIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hilversum 1211 EC, NL
Hilversum 1211 EC, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK J NIELSEN
MARK J NIELSEN LAW OFFICE OF MARK J NIELSEN12351 LK CITY WAY NE STE 203SEATTLE, WA 98125UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in the design, supply, advertising and purchase of spectacle frames and lenses; downloadable software for use in the design, supply, advertising and purchase of spectacle frames and lenses via the internet; optical laboratory equipment and parts and fittings therefor, namely, lens analyzers, lens meters, auto lens meters, spectrometers, blockers, frame rulers, pupillary distance gauges, demonstration lenses; spectacles; glasses; eyeglasses; sunglasses; eyeglass lenses; eyeglass cases; eyeglass chains; eyeglass cords; eyeglass restraining straps; eyeglass frames; eyeglass holders; eyeglass mountings, namely nose pads and hinges; monocles; pince-nez; eye shades, namely clip on shades that attach to ordinary glasses and act as sunshades; eye cups, namely rubber shields that attach to the side of spectacles to protect the eyes; safety glasses and eyeglasses for optical use equipped with protective shields; eyeglass shields; safety eyeglasses for use during sporting activities; protective eye shields; goggles and safety goggles; magnifying glasses; eye glass equipment, namely glare and light filters which attach to optical lenses; contact lenses; contact lens cases, containers and holders; retinal cameras | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |