USPTO serial 76155978
THE FLOWER COMPANY INTERNATIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 3, 2003
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE FLOWER COMPANY INTERNATIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin W. Guynn
KEVIN W GUYNN GREER, BURNS & CRAIN LTD300 S WACKER DR STE 2500CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | LIVE CUT FLORAL BOUQUETS, AND FLORAL AND PLANT ARRANGEMENTS COMPRISED OF LIVE CUT FLOWERS AND OTHER SMALL PLANTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 19, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |